Development milestones
First flight: May 15, 1963 (Model 87) January 24, 1964 (Model 65-90)
Developed from: Beechcraft Queen Air
Aircraft libraryBeechcraft King Air family
Acroterion · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Beechcraft King Air 350 N614CW FDK MD1.Beechcraft King Air family
Mechanical yoke controls and pitch-trim relief, with separate twin-propeller, gear and flap cues.
TurbopropB35013 profile choices
Know the plane
Beechcraft's King Air range grew from the 90-series aircraft into a broad family of pressurised utility and business transports. The later 200 and 300 series were originally marketed as Super King Airs. Their T-tails provide a quick visual distinction from the smaller 90-series lineage.
The C90 and 350 aircraft gathered here differ in airframe, engines and systems. They also span conventional instrumentation and modern avionics. The named variants identify the airframe and equipment described in each source.
Beechcraft King Air 350i
- Powerplant
- 2× P&W PT6A-60A, 1,050 shp each↗
- Seats
- Up to 11↗
- Max takeoff weight
- 15,000 lb (6,804 kg)↗
- Wingspan
- 57 ft 11 in (17.65 m)↗
- Length
- 46 ft 8 in (14.22 m)↗
- Max operating (Vmo)
- 263 KIAS↗
- Stall, landing config (Vs0)
- ≈81 KCAS↗
- Max cruise
- 312 KTAS↗
- Service ceiling
- 35,000 ft↗
- Range
- 1,806 nm↗
- Usable fuel
- 539 US gal↗
- Pressurization
- 6.6 psi differential↗
More about this aircraft on AirframeDB
The 350 feels lighter at the controls than the 300
Aarons reports an evaluation of N120SK during the Super King Air 350's late certification programme. One of the two evaluation pilots already knew the Model 300, making the comparison especially revealing: that pilot initially overcontrolled in pitch because the new aircraft required less effort. The crew subsequently liked the balance between pitch and roll forces, its climb attitude and the view from the cockpit. Across six takeoffs, they did not encounter power surging that needed manual correction.
The report also describes slow flight and asymmetric airwork. The crew found useful aileron response through the stall exercises and liked the aircraft's engine-out handling. Their observations of longitudinal and lateral stability are tied to the test loading and configuration described in the article. Reduced control effort was a prominent difference from the earlier model he knew.
Taking a factory-new 350 across the Atlantic
Horne accompanied Peter Herr on a delivery flight carrying a new King Air 350 from the United States to its European customer. From the cockpit, the high seating position, broad wing and substantial feel made an immediate impression. The journey then supplied a more demanding test of the aircraft's usefulness: the Goose Bay–Reykjavik leg lasted nearly five hours, with headwinds reaching 75 knots near Greenland and the predicted fuel reserve becoming an uncomfortable focus of attention.
They arrived with more fuel than the most worrying prediction had suggested, but the destination provided another challenge. Strong, gusty wind at Reykjavik moved even this heavy aircraft around, requiring an appreciable crab on approach. Horne's account also stresses the value of familiarity with the flare and of having another pilot share the navigation-system work.
A busy cockpit and a dependable working aircraft
McClellan writes from continuing experience in King Air 350 and 360 operations. He finds the cockpit demanding in small, physical ways: the pedestal makes getting into the seats awkward, propeller noise makes a good headset valuable, and changes in power or propeller speed call for attention to trim. The throttle response rewards careful, small movements. Once settled, however, he finds the seats comfortable, and passengers farther behind the propellers experience a quieter cabin.
His account also describes different crew preferences for operating the Pro Line Fusion avionics, which provide several ways to accomplish the same task. He favours cruising in the twenties rather than using the aircraft's highest available levels, partly for cabin comfort. Against those irritations, he sets his operation's dispatch experience: approximately 1,600 hours over four years with one cancellation attributed to a starter-generator. The combination helps explain his continued appreciation of an aircraft whose cockpit he describes without romanticising it.
Public sources 23
- Beechcraft King AirResearch background · Wikipedia revision 1374355378 · retrieved 2026-09-12
- Microsoft Flight Simulator aircraft manuals
- MSFS 2024 FAQ and edition aircraft inventory
- MSFS 2020 FAQ and edition aircraft inventory
- Beechcraft King Air C90B POH
- X-Plane 12 Desktop Manual
- X-Plane aircraft and avionics manuals
- X-Plane 11 Desktop Manual
- King Air 350Official developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
- What saves this KingAOPA Pilot, page dated 11 January 2024: a first-person account of flying a King Air 350/360.J. Mac McClellan · 11 January 2024 · operating experience
- Steam Gauge Overhaul - Analog King AirOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
- Inflight Report: Beech’s Super King Air 350Richard N. Aarons · October 1989 · publisher reprint
- The Biggest King AirThomas A. Horne · June 2002 · King Air 350 delivery
- KING AIR 350 for X-Plane 12-airfoillabs-KA350_XP12Official developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
- King Air 350 XP11-airfoillabs-KA350Official developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
- ICAO Doc 8643 — aircraft type designatorsPublic search data retrieved 2026-09-14; authority update 2026-09-03
- King Air C90B EVO, G1000 BlackhawkAuthor-hosted product listing observed 2026-09-29; original page bytes unavailable (prior browser note preserved)
- King Air C90B EVO GNS/GTN Blackhawk XP12Author-hosted product listing observed 2026-09-29; original page bytes unavailable (prior browser note preserved)
- B200 MSFS2020 – CarenadoProduct listing captured 2026-09-23; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
- B200 MSFS2024 – CarenadoProduct listing captured 2026-09-23; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
- Beechcraft King Air 350i POH/AFMPrint or archived reference; no public link
- FAA TCDS A24CEPrint or archived reference; no public link
- Textron published dataPrint or archived reference; no public link
How the profile models it
Carenado B200 King Air (MSFS)
Free + ProMSFS 2020MSFS 2024Carenado
Beechcraft's King Air range grew from the 90-series aircraft into a broad family of pressurised utility and business transports. The later 200 and 300 series were originally marketed as Super King Airs. Their T-tails provide a quick visual distinction from the smaller 90-series lineage.
This profile selects Carenado B200 King Air (MSFS) for MSFS 2020, MSFS 2024.
Spring resistance builds with the selected airspeed response. A separate aerodynamic term adds speed-dependent control load.
Pitch-trim relief is off. Autopilot following is off.
This exact revision has not been enabled for public installation.
Controls and trim
The King Air family spans C90, B200 and 350 airframes with different avionics and powerplants. The C90B manual documents mechanical elevator and aileron trim tabs, with rudder trim acting on yaw. A published 350 flight report describes heavier pitch than roll and effective trim wheels, supplying related-family handling context rather than a measured 350i force curve. The Black Square 350 and Airfoillabs 350 retain their own autopilot logic.
The selected implementation
Carenado B200 MSFS has its own edition scope; its twin PT6 and retractable tricycle equipment remain distinct from C90/350.
About the values
The gains are normalized profile settings. They describe the chosen effect balance; hand force depends on the device and its output limits. IAS references are tuning values rather than operating limits. Physical acceptance of this revision remains pending.
Master gain & control system
Master gain85%
The final overall output scale applied to everything the model produces, before the device cap.
More: everything (spring, loads, effects) gets stronger together.
Less: everything softens together.
Why here: Scales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits.
Forces
Spring strength74%
The base centring force that pulls the stick back to centre. Every other force stacks on it. Too low and the stick feels limp in normal flight; too high and it fights your hand and masks the smaller cues layered above it.
More: firmer centring that resists your hand at all times.
Less: a limper stick that leans on aerodynamic load alone.
Why here: Published 350 handling supports a qualitative pitch-heavy balance; it does not fix a universal pitch/roll force ratio for every King Air. The baseline spring is 0.74. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 65 KIAS.
Exact product researchBeechcraft King Air C90B POHSpring deadband4%
A small neutral zone around centre where the spring stays quiet, so tiny movements at rest don't chatter. Wider is calmer but looser; narrower is more precise but can twitch around centre.
More: a calmer but looser centre with more free play.
Less: a tighter centre that may chatter at rest.
Why here: Sets travel around the centre before the baseline spring resists. Smaller values engage it sooner.
Overall aerodynamic load68%
A master scale over both sustained axis loads, applied before their independent balance. Profiles normally leave this alone and tune the two axis loads instead.
More: both axes load up harder.
Less: both axes lighten together.
Why here: The aerodynamic-load gain is 0.68 with an indicated-speed reference of 230 KIAS. This supplies speed-dependent loading alongside the spring.
Airspeed blendingTrue
Enables the low-speed spring engagement window (start/full knots above). Off, the spring is constant at all speeds.
Why here: Allows baseline spring strength to rise with indicated airspeed where the control law permits it.
Low-speed spring floor55%
How much of the spring survives at a standstill, before airspeed can build any aerodynamic force. A high floor keeps the parked stick firm; a low floor gives the loose, cable-slack feel of a parked light aircraft.
More: a firmer stick while parked and taxiing.
Less: a floppier parked stick that only wakes up with airspeed.
Why here: Sets low-speed spring strength as a fraction of baseline when blending is enabled. One keeps full strength.
Spring engagement start8 kt
The airspeed where the spring begins climbing from its low-speed floor toward full strength: the controls "coming alive" on the takeoff roll.
Why here: Sets the IAS where the low-speed spring blend starts rising. This is a feel threshold, not a flight limit.
Spring engagement full65 kt
The airspeed where the spring reaches full strength. Between the start and this point, centring firms up progressively as airflow builds over the controls.
Why here: Sets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it.
Force tuning speed230
The indicated airspeed where aerodynamic load reaches its designed full level. It anchors the whole load curve to the aircraft's real speed range: a 172 loads up by 110 knots, a jet much later.
More: loads arrive later; the stick stays light up to a higher speed.
Less: loads arrive earlier and cruise feels heavier.
Why here: Sets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit.
Centre firmness vs speed10%
How much the centring itself stiffens with speed, on top of the deflection loads. Zero keeps centre feel constant; more makes the stick centre harder at cruise and looser in the pattern.
More: a centre that hardens noticeably as you go faster.
Less: constant centre feel at every speed.
Why here: The high-speed spring-stiffening gain is 0.1. It strengthens the permitted spring response above 65 KIAS, with the squared-speed ratio capped at 5.
Centre stiffening cap5
The upper limit on speed-driven centre stiffening, so very fast flight can't wind the spring up without bound.
More: more total stiffening allowed at high speed.
Less: stiffening clamps off sooner.
Why here: Limits the squared airspeed ratio used for high-speed spring stiffening; it is not a device-force cap.
Aileron load72%
The sustained roll load from aileron deflection and airspeed, balanced independently of pitch. Together with the elevator load it sets the control-harmony ratio reviewers talk about.
More: heavier roll forces.
Less: lighter, quicker-feeling ailerons.
Why here: Roll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.72 and 1, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled.
Elevator load100%
The sustained pitch load from elevator deflection and airspeed, balanced independently of roll. This is the main lever behind a type's pitch weight. It does not touch aileron, spring, trim, or buffet forces.
More: heavier sustained pitch forces at speed.
Less: a lighter elevator that takes less muscle to hold.
Why here: Scales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings.
Max output force55%
A cap on each steady pitch or roll force before it reaches the device, guarding against slamming or saturating the hardware in strong maneuvers.
More: stronger peak steady forces before clipping.
Less: a gentler ceiling; hard maneuvers flatten out sooner.
Why here: Caps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate.
Trim
Trim relief (elevator)0%
How strongly elevator trim relieves held pitch force and shifts where the stick settles. At 100%, a properly trimmed aircraft needs no held pressure, the trim-away-the-load workflow of real flying.
More: trim removes more of the held pitch force; at 100% full trim zeroes it.
Less: you keep holding force even when trimmed.
Why here: Mechanical elevator trim supports pitch relief, while aileron trim is separate from rudder trim. The selected authorities approximate those axis responses. Pitch relief is off, with stored authority 0; roll authority is 0.
Exact product researchBeechcraft King Air C90B POHTrim relief (aileron)0%
The same relief for roll trim. Most GA types have no real aileron trim, so this stays at zero; types with roll trim get a matching value.
More: roll trim removes more held roll force.
Less: roll trim does less.
Why here: Scales supported roll-trim relief and permitted centre movement. Zero removes roll response.
Effect gains · ground
Runway rumble42%
Rolling surface vibration from wheel speed and surface type: pavement, grass, or gravel under the gear.
More: louder surface texture through the stick.
Less: a smoother taxi.
Why here: Sets rolling texture strength, modified by speed, surface and undercarriage configuration.
Gear bumps32%
Short discrete bumps from expansion joints, ruts, and rough surface, punctuating the continuous rumble.
More: sharper hits from joints and ruts.
Less: softer ground detail.
Why here: Sets gear-bump texture during ground motion, separate from touchdown impact.
Effect gains · airframe
Stall buffet28%
Airframe shake approaching the stall and while the stall warning is active: how loudly this wing announces it is unhappy. Types with a crisp break get modest buffet and let the horn carry the warning.
More: a louder pre-stall shake.
Less: a quieter wing; the horn carries the warning.
Why here: Sets stall-buffet strength. Zero removes the cue without changing simulator stalls or warnings.
Mach buffet0%
Transonic buffet approaching the Mach limit. Meaningful for jets near MMO, zero for pistons and turboprops that never get there.
More: stronger transonic buffet near the Mach limit.
Less: a smoother high-Mach ride.
Why here: Sets high-Mach buffet strength; onset and full-strength thresholds are separate.
Flap buffet0%
Low-frequency airframe vibration with flaps extended into the airflow, in the speed window where they actually work the air.
More: a rougher ride with flaps working the air.
Less: smoother approach flap.
Why here: Sets flap buffet at the configured position and speed gates. Flap movement texture is separate.
Gear buffet0%
Airframe drumming from retractable gear hanging in the airstream. Zero for fixed-gear types, where the airframe never changes shape.
More: more drumming with the wheels hanging out.
Less: cleaner gear-down flight.
Why here: Sets gear aerodynamic buffet; movement and ground-contact cues are separate.
Stick shaker50%
The dedicated stall stick-shaker buzz, fired by the aircraft's own stall-warning system. Only types with a real shaker get a value; everything else relies on aerodynamic buffet and the horn.
More: a harder stick-shaker buzz.
Less: a subtler shaker.
Why here: Sets triggered shaker strength; inactive while the shaker feature is disabled.
Effect gains · engine, mechanical & drag
Touchdown thump82%
The one-shot kick when the wheels meet the runway, scaled by sink rate: a greaser whispers, a firm arrival thumps.
More: a harder kick at touchdown.
Less: softer arrivals.
Why here: Sets landing-impact strength; landing telemetry and response shape determine the pulse.
Reverse rumble0%
Rollout vibration while reverse thrust or beta-range props are working. Zero for types without reverse.
More: a rougher rollout under reverse.
Less: quieter reverse.
Why here: Sets reverse-thrust vibration with valid reverser and engine conditions. Zero removes the cue.
Engine rumble6%
Continuous powerplant vibration following RPM between idle and full power, the ever-present reminder that something is burning fuel up front.
More: more engine through the stick.
Less: a quieter powerplant.
Why here: Sets estimated engine vibration using configured telemetry and response, not measured cockpit vibration.
Flap motion12%
Continuous vibration only while the sim reports the flap surfaces actually travelling. It follows real actuator motion and failures, not an estimated timer.
More: more vibration while the flap surfaces travel.
Less: quieter flap runs.
Why here: Sets texture from observed flap movement; a command without movement does not establish the cue.
Autopilot follow
AP follow authority10%
How far autopilot commands may physically move the stick. Kept tiny in MSFS, where a moved axis can read back as pilot input; zero disables following entirely.
More: the autopilot visibly moves your stick further.
Less: a barely perceptible follow.
Why here: Sets admitted AP-follow gain, not a percentage of travel. Runtime ownership and input limits still apply.
Stick feel
StickFeel · Trim feel enabledFalse
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Retained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement.
StickFeel · Trim relief enabledFalse
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Allows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount.
StickFeel · Force trim enabledFalse
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Enables local force trim, separate from aircraft-owned trim and add-on integration qualification.
StickFeel · G load enabledTrue
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Allows load-factor changes to modify permitted spring laws. Passive fly-by-wire feel can suppress it.
StickFeel · Rate damping enabledTrue
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Enables rate damping with the configured coefficients and control law.
Autopilot
Autopilot · Follow enabledFalse
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Autopilot following is off; the configured spring and load retain the hardware feel.
Autopilot · Neutral hold enabledFalse
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Permits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target.
Autopilot · Neutral hold strength0.6
Why here: Sets admitted AP neutral-hold strength; inactive while neutral hold is disabled.
Aero
Aero · EnabledTrue
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Enables aerodynamic cues; each still needs nonzero strength and its simulator conditions.
Aero · Max flap index2
Where this effect reaches full strength (or has fully faded, for washouts).
More: a more gradual build to a later peak.
Less: a quicker build.
Why here: Sets the final flap index for detent normalization. UP plus three detents uses maximum index3.
Aero · Min flap index2
Where this effect begins fading in.
More: the effect begins later.
Less: it begins earlier.
Why here: Sets the first flap detent that admits buffet; this is a handle index, not degrees.
Aero · Shaker enabledFalse
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Permits shaker at supported warning conditions; the switch does not establish aircraft equipment.
Ground
Ground · EnabledTrue
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Enables ground effects; each still needs its own strength and contact or motion telemetry.
Engine
Engine · EnabledTrue
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Enables engine cues with nonzero settings and valid running-engine telemetry.
Mechanical
Mechanical · EnabledTrue
Whether this feature is active in this profile.
Why here: Enables accessory cues with configured strengths and observed accessory movement.
Mechanical · Gain0.12
The strength of this effect.
More: a stronger effect.
Less: a weaker one.
Why here: Sets texture from observed gear movement, separate from aerodynamic and touchdown effects.
All profile settings
| Parameter | Value | What it controls and why |
|---|---|---|
| Spring strength | 0.74 | Published 350 handling supports a qualitative pitch-heavy balance; it does not fix a universal pitch/roll force ratio for every King Air. The baseline spring is 0.74. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 65 KIAS. |
| Spring deadband | 0.04 | Sets travel around the centre before the baseline spring resists. Smaller values engage it sooner. |
| Force gain | 0.68 | The aerodynamic-load gain is 0.68 with an indicated-speed reference of 230 KIAS. This supplies speed-dependent loading alongside the spring. |
| Master gain | 0.85 | Scales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits. |
| Dynamic-pressure blend | True | Allows baseline spring strength to rise with indicated airspeed where the control law permits it. |
| Minimum spring factor | 0.55 | Sets low-speed spring strength as a fraction of baseline when blending is enabled. One keeps full strength. |
| Spring wake-up speed | 8 kt | Sets the IAS where the low-speed spring blend starts rising. This is a feel threshold, not a flight limit. |
| Spring full-strength speed | 65 kt | Sets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it. |
| Force tuning speed | 230.0 kt | Sets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit. |
| Airspeed spring stiffening | 0.1 | The high-speed spring-stiffening gain is 0.1. It strengthens the permitted spring response above 65 KIAS, with the squared-speed ratio capped at 5. |
| Airspeed stiffening cap | 5 | Limits the squared airspeed ratio used for high-speed spring stiffening; it is not a device-force cap. |
| Aileron force scale | 0.72 | Roll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.72 and 1, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled. |
| Elevator force scale | 1 | Scales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings. |
| Maximum output force | 0.55 | Caps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate. |
| StickFeel · Trim feel enabled | False | Retained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement. |
| StickFeel · Trim relief enabled | False | Allows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount. |
| StickFeel · Elevator authority | 0 | Mechanical elevator trim supports pitch relief, while aileron trim is separate from rudder trim. The selected authorities approximate those axis responses. Pitch relief is off, with stored authority 0; roll authority is 0. |
| StickFeel · Aileron authority | 0 | Scales supported roll-trim relief and permitted centre movement. Zero removes roll response. |
| StickFeel · Force trim enabled | False | Enables local force trim, separate from aircraft-owned trim and add-on integration qualification. |
| StickFeel · G load enabled | True | Allows load-factor changes to modify permitted spring laws. Passive fly-by-wire feel can suppress it. |
| StickFeel · Rate damping enabled | True | Enables rate damping with the configured coefficients and control law. |
| Autopilot · Follow enabled | False | Autopilot following is off; the configured spring and load retain the hardware feel. |
| Autopilot · Follow authority | 0.1 | Sets admitted AP-follow gain, not a percentage of travel. Runtime ownership and input limits still apply. |
| Autopilot · Neutral hold enabled | False | Permits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target. |
| Autopilot · Neutral hold strength | 0.6 | Sets admitted AP neutral-hold strength; inactive while neutral hold is disabled. |
| Aero · Enabled | True | Enables aerodynamic cues; each still needs nonzero strength and its simulator conditions. |
| Aero · Gain | 0.28 | Sets stall-buffet strength. Zero removes the cue without changing simulator stalls or warnings. |
| Aero · Gain | 0 | Sets high-Mach buffet strength; onset and full-strength thresholds are separate. |
| Aero · Gain | 0 | Sets flap buffet at the configured position and speed gates. Flap movement texture is separate. |
| Aero · Max flap index | 2 | Sets the final flap index for detent normalization. UP plus three detents uses maximum index3. |
| Aero · Min flap index | 2 | Sets the first flap detent that admits buffet; this is a handle index, not degrees. |
| Aero · Gain | 0 | Sets gear aerodynamic buffet; movement and ground-contact cues are separate. |
| Aero · Shaker enabled | False | Permits shaker at supported warning conditions; the switch does not establish aircraft equipment. |
| Aero · Amplitude | 0.5 | Sets triggered shaker strength; inactive while the shaker feature is disabled. |
| Ground · Enabled | True | Enables ground effects; each still needs its own strength and contact or motion telemetry. |
| Ground · Gain | 0.42 | Sets rolling texture strength, modified by speed, surface and undercarriage configuration. |
| Ground · Gain | 0.32 | Sets gear-bump texture during ground motion, separate from touchdown impact. |
| Ground · Gain | 0.82 | Sets landing-impact strength; landing telemetry and response shape determine the pulse. |
| Ground · Gain | 0 | Sets reverse-thrust vibration with valid reverser and engine conditions. Zero removes the cue. |
| Engine · Enabled | True | Enables engine cues with nonzero settings and valid running-engine telemetry. |
| Engine · Gain | 0.06 | Sets estimated engine vibration using configured telemetry and response, not measured cockpit vibration. |
| Mechanical · Enabled | True | Enables accessory cues with configured strengths and observed accessory movement. |
| Mechanical · Gain | 0.12 | Sets texture from observed flap movement; a command without movement does not establish the cue. |
| Mechanical · Gain | 0.12 | Sets texture from observed gear movement, separate from aerodynamic and touchdown effects. |
Public sources 23
- Beechcraft King AirResearch background · Wikipedia revision 1374355378 · retrieved 2026-09-12
- Exact product researchAirfoillabs King Air350 v2.0.3: aircraft, systems, AP and requirementsOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
- Beechcraft King Air C90B POHLaminar C90B manual PDF29-30, trim controls
- B200 MSFS2020 – CarenadoExact product, simulator declarations and configuration featuresProduct listing captured 2026-09-23; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
- Microsoft Flight Simulator aircraft manuals
- MSFS 2024 FAQ and edition aircraft inventory
- MSFS 2020 FAQ and edition aircraft inventory
- X-Plane 12 Desktop Manual
- X-Plane aircraft and avionics manuals
- X-Plane 11 Desktop Manual
- What saves this KingAOPA Pilot, page dated 11 January 2024: a first-person account of flying a King Air 350/360.J. Mac McClellan · 11 January 2024 · operating experience
- Steam Gauge Overhaul - Analog King AirOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
- Inflight Report: Beech’s Super King Air 350Richard N. Aarons · October 1989 · publisher reprint
- The Biggest King AirThomas A. Horne · June 2002 · King Air 350 delivery
- KING AIR 350 for X-Plane 12-airfoillabs-KA350_XP12Official developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
- King Air 350 XP11-airfoillabs-KA350Official developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
- ICAO Doc 8643 — aircraft type designatorsPublic search data retrieved 2026-09-14; authority update 2026-09-03
- King Air C90B EVO, G1000 BlackhawkAuthor-hosted product listing observed 2026-09-29; original page bytes unavailable (prior browser note preserved)
- King Air C90B EVO GNS/GTN Blackhawk XP12Author-hosted product listing observed 2026-09-29; original page bytes unavailable (prior browser note preserved)
- B200 MSFS2024 – CarenadoProduct listing captured 2026-09-23; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
- Beechcraft King Air 350i POH/AFMPrint or archived reference; no public link
- FAA TCDS A24CEPrint or archived reference; no public link
- Textron published dataPrint or archived reference; no public link
Community & corrections
If your time in the type says this page got something wrong, correct it here.
Pilot corrections
Fly this aircraft? Correct this page.
This page is built from cited references, and real time in the type beats a citation. Quote the claim that reads wrong and tell us what the actual aircraft does. Corrections go to the maintainer for review and feed the next revision of this research.
Sign in to submit a correction. No password, just a one-time email link.
Sign in
Hangar talk
Open conversation about flying and tuning the Beechcraft King Air family, in the community forum. Corrections above go privately to the maintainer; hangar talk is public.
Sign in to start it. No password, just a one-time email link.
Sign in
Community
Community profiles for this aircraft
No community profiles for this aircraft yet.
Tuned it your way? Share a profile and it will appear here.