Aircraft libraryBoeing B-17 Flying Fortress
Boeing B-17 Flying FortressAirwolfhound · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress — real-aircraft reference photograph.

Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress

The four-engine Flying Fortress, a major American bomber of the Second World War.
Warbird2 profile choices

Know the plane

Boeing developed the B-17 during the 1930s for the United States Army Air Corps. It became closely associated with the European air war, but the aircraft also served in transport, maritime patrol and rescue work. The simulator product represents the B-17G production version.

Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress · Specifications (B-17G) · real aircraft; source units retained

Wingspan
103 ft 9 in (31.62 m)↗
Height
19 ft 1 in (5.82 m)↗
Wing area
1,420 sq ft (131.92 m² )↗
Empty weight
36,135 lb (16,391 kg)↗
Gross weight
54,000 lb (24,500 kg)↗
Max takeoff weight
65,500 lb (29,700 kg)↗
Powerplant
4 × Wright R-1820 -97 "Cyclone" turbosupercharged radial engines , 1,200 hp (895 kW) each↗
Propellers
3-bladed Hamilton-Standard constant-speed propeller↗
Maximum speed
295 mph (472 km/h, 256.34 kn) (At 25,000 Feet)↗
Cruise speed
182 mph (293 km/h, 158 kn)↗
Range
2,000 mi (3,219 km, 1,738 nmi) with 6,000 lb ( 2,700 kg ) bombload↗
Service ceiling
35,600 ft (10,850 m)↗

More about this aircraft on AirframeDB

From Model 299 to wartime formations

The Fortress began as Boeing’s Model 299, first flown in 1935, and developed through successive wartime versions to the B-17G. It became closely associated with the Eighth Air Force’s bombing campaign over Germany and occupied Europe. Boeing, Douglas and Vega built the aircraft; crews continued using some survivors for civil work after the war.

One survivor’s changing jobs

The museum’s B-17F, 42-29782, was built in Seattle in 1943 and served principally in training. Its later life included a park war memorial, aerial spraying, firefighting and appearances in Tora! Tora! Tora! and Memphis Belle. Restoration returned it to military appearance as Boeing Bee. Its screen roles and restored equipment are part of that individual aircraft’s later history.

A retirement dream becomes a copilot checkout

Bjorkman used money she had intended for retirement to buy a B-17 copilot checkout at an EAA auction. She already had considerable tailwheel experience, but the largest aircraft she had flown was a Piper Aztec. Additional light-twin practice helped her prepare, while the sight of the Fortress in its hangar made the scale of the next step unmistakable. Starting it also introduced her to the coordinated work of the instructor and ground crew.

Once airborne, she found the controls unexpectedly light and the aircraft comfortable to manoeuvre. The weather made landing a different experience: Davis coached her through a demanding crosswind and helped with asymmetric power. She finished that first landing tired, then returned the next day for more practice. The achievement was specific and personal: a second-in-command endorsement in an aircraft she had long wanted to fly.

Fear, crew humour and the loss of a friend

Nelms remembered the shock of an encounter with antiaircraft fire. A burst beneath the aircraft made him frightened, followed by embarrassment at his own reaction. He describes gathering himself and checking on the crew. Their responses, including a radio operator joking that nobody had asked about him yet, gave that frightening moment an unexpectedly ordinary human exchange.

Another memory was much harder to carry. He had eaten breakfast with a friend before a mission, then watched that friend’s aircraft suffer a hit and descend out of control. In the museum interview, the contrast between their familiar morning conversation and the loss later that day remains vivid. His recollections give the Fortress a crew’s perspective: fear, concern for the people aboard and the sudden absence of someone who had been part of everyday life.

Learning the bomber, and meeting Marie

Clark arrived at Las Vegas Army Airfield in 1944 after training in a small twin. The B-17 cockpit seemed enormous and crowded with unfamiliar instruments, and he learned its work through gunnery-training flights before joining a crew bound for England. That same posting introduced him to Marie Mountain, a WASP pilot. An invitation to listen to Debussy at the library began the relationship that led to their marriage.

With the 100th Bomb Group, he discovered how much formation flying demanded physically. Departure and assembly could take place in poor weather, followed by long periods wearing an oxygen mask and cold-weather equipment. An electrically heated suit solved one problem and created another: perspiration fogged his goggles. These practical discomforts sit beside the larger events in his account, showing how much effort simply occupying the copilot’s seat could require.

Public sources 8
  1. Boeing B-17 Flying FortressResearch background · retrieved 2026-09-12
  2. B-17G Flying FortressOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  3. Learning to Fly the FortressEileen Bjorkman · July 2015 · checkout purchased in 2013
  4. Stories of a B-17 PilotDick Nelms interview · 29 June 2019
  5. ‘Bloody Hundredth’ B-17 Pilot Shares WWII ExperiencesKaren Abeyasekere interviews John A. Clark · 6 May 2022
  6. Boeing B-17F Flying FortressFamily history and the museum’s 42-29782
  7. ICAO Doc 8643 — aircraft type designatorsPublic search data retrieved 2026-09-14; authority update 2026-09-03
  8. B-17G Flying Fortress MSFS24 by MicroProse | Contrail ShopProduct listing captured 2026-09-30; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue

How the profile models it

MicroProse B-17G Flying Fortress

Free + Pro
MSFS 2024MicroProse

Boeing developed the B-17 during the 1930s for the United States Army Air Corps. It became closely associated with the European air war, but the aircraft also served in transport, maritime patrol and rescue work. The B-17G represented in the simulator catalogue is a particular production version, not a label for every Flying Fortress configuration.

This profile selects MicroProse B-17G Flying Fortress for MSFS 2024.

Spring resistance builds with the selected airspeed response. A separate aerodynamic term adds speed-dependent control load.

Valid trim provides the configured pressure relief. Autopilot following is off.

This exact revision has not been enabled for public installation.

Controls and trim

MicroProse's B-17G manual describes four R-1820 engines, constant-speed propellers and trim tabs on all three axes. Its later change log records flight-model, trim, flap and centre-of-gravity corrections, so early feature descriptions and cockpit-autopilot operation remain version-sensitive. Khamsin's separate X-Plane B-17G listing marks work in progress; that reference must not be presented as a released implementation.

B-17G Flying FortressB-17G Flying Fortress

The selected implementation

MicroProse's MSFS 2024 B-17G has version-sensitive trim/flap/CG/autopilot changes. Advertised post-launch crew/maintenance features are not assumed complete.

Advertised B17G manualB17G changelogB-17G Flying Fortress

About the values

The gains are normalized profile settings. They describe the chosen effect balance; hand force depends on the device and its output limits. IAS references are tuning values rather than operating limits. Physical acceptance of this revision remains pending.

Master gain & control system

Master gain85%

The final overall output scale applied to everything the model produces, before the device cap.

More: everything (spring, loads, effects) gets stronger together.

Less: everything softens together.

Why here: Scales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits.

Forces

Spring strength74%

The base centring force that pulls the stick back to centre. Every other force stacks on it. Too low and the stick feels limp in normal flight; too high and it fights your hand and masks the smaller cues layered above it.

More: firmer centring that resists your hand at all times.

Less: a limper stick that leans on aerodynamic load alone.

Why here: The selected mechanical-control loading belongs to the named B-17G reference; four engine cues do not establish a multiple of yoke hand force. The baseline spring is 0.74. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 70 KIAS.

B-17G Flying FortressB-17G Flying Fortress
Spring deadband4%

A small neutral zone around centre where the spring stays quiet, so tiny movements at rest don't chatter. Wider is calmer but looser; narrower is more precise but can twitch around centre.

More: a calmer but looser centre with more free play.

Less: a tighter centre that may chatter at rest.

Why here: Sets travel around the centre before the baseline spring resists. Smaller values engage it sooner.

Overall aerodynamic load46%

A master scale over both sustained axis loads, applied before their independent balance. Profiles normally leave this alone and tune the two axis loads instead.

More: both axes load up harder.

Less: both axes lighten together.

Why here: The aerodynamic-load gain is 0.46 with an indicated-speed reference of 150 KIAS. This supplies speed-dependent loading alongside the spring.

Airspeed blendingTrue

Enables the low-speed spring engagement window (start/full knots above). Off, the spring is constant at all speeds.

Why here: Allows baseline spring strength to rise with indicated airspeed where the control law permits it.

Low-speed spring floor55%

How much of the spring survives at a standstill, before airspeed can build any aerodynamic force. A high floor keeps the parked stick firm; a low floor gives the loose, cable-slack feel of a parked light aircraft.

More: a firmer stick while parked and taxiing.

Less: a floppier parked stick that only wakes up with airspeed.

Why here: Sets low-speed spring strength as a fraction of baseline when blending is enabled. One keeps full strength.

Spring engagement start20 kt

The airspeed where the spring begins climbing from its low-speed floor toward full strength: the controls "coming alive" on the takeoff roll.

Why here: Sets the IAS where the low-speed spring blend starts rising. This is a feel threshold, not a flight limit.

Spring engagement full70 kt

The airspeed where the spring reaches full strength. Between the start and this point, centring firms up progressively as airflow builds over the controls.

Why here: Sets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it.

Force tuning speed150

The indicated airspeed where aerodynamic load reaches its designed full level. It anchors the whole load curve to the aircraft's real speed range: a 172 loads up by 110 knots, a jet much later.

More: loads arrive later; the stick stays light up to a higher speed.

Less: loads arrive earlier and cruise feels heavier.

Why here: Sets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit.

Centre firmness vs speed10%

How much the centring itself stiffens with speed, on top of the deflection loads. Zero keeps centre feel constant; more makes the stick centre harder at cruise and looser in the pattern.

More: a centre that hardens noticeably as you go faster.

Less: constant centre feel at every speed.

Why here: The high-speed spring-stiffening gain is 0.1. It strengthens the permitted spring response above 70 KIAS, with the squared-speed ratio capped at 5.

Centre stiffening cap5

The upper limit on speed-driven centre stiffening, so very fast flight can't wind the spring up without bound.

More: more total stiffening allowed at high speed.

Less: stiffening clamps off sooner.

Why here: Limits the squared airspeed ratio used for high-speed spring stiffening; it is not a device-force cap.

Aileron load65%

The sustained roll load from aileron deflection and airspeed, balanced independently of pitch. Together with the elevator load it sets the control-harmony ratio reviewers talk about.

More: heavier roll forces.

Less: lighter, quicker-feeling ailerons.

Why here: Roll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.65 and 0.86, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled.

Elevator load86%

The sustained pitch load from elevator deflection and airspeed, balanced independently of roll. This is the main lever behind a type's pitch weight. It does not touch aileron, spring, trim, or buffet forces.

More: heavier sustained pitch forces at speed.

Less: a lighter elevator that takes less muscle to hold.

Why here: Scales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings.

Max output force55%

A cap on each steady pitch or roll force before it reaches the device, guarding against slamming or saturating the hardware in strong maneuvers.

More: stronger peak steady forces before clipping.

Less: a gentler ceiling; hard maneuvers flatten out sooner.

Why here: Caps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate.

Trim

Trim relief (elevator)30%

How strongly elevator trim relieves held pitch force and shifts where the stick settles. At 100%, a properly trimmed aircraft needs no held pressure, the trim-away-the-load workflow of real flying.

More: trim removes more of the held pitch force; at 100% full trim zeroes it.

Less: you keep holding force even when trimmed.

Why here: Three-axis trim tabs support separate pitch and roll pressure relief, with developer revision differences kept visible. Pitch authority 0.3 provides load relief and permitted centre movement; roll authority is 0.13.

B-17G Flying FortressB-17G Flying Fortress
Trim relief (aileron)13%

The same relief for roll trim. Most GA types have no real aileron trim, so this stays at zero; types with roll trim get a matching value.

More: roll trim removes more held roll force.

Less: roll trim does less.

Why here: Scales supported roll-trim relief and permitted centre movement. Zero removes roll response.

Effect gains · ground

Runway rumble42%

Rolling surface vibration from wheel speed and surface type: pavement, grass, or gravel under the gear.

More: louder surface texture through the stick.

Less: a smoother taxi.

Why here: Sets rolling texture strength, modified by speed, surface and undercarriage configuration.

Gear bumps30%

Short discrete bumps from expansion joints, ruts, and rough surface, punctuating the continuous rumble.

More: sharper hits from joints and ruts.

Less: softer ground detail.

Why here: Sets gear-bump texture during ground motion, separate from touchdown impact.

Effect gains · airframe

Stall buffet35%

Airframe shake approaching the stall and while the stall warning is active: how loudly this wing announces it is unhappy. Types with a crisp break get modest buffet and let the horn carry the warning.

More: a louder pre-stall shake.

Less: a quieter wing; the horn carries the warning.

Why here: Sets stall-buffet strength. Zero removes the cue without changing simulator stalls or warnings.

Mach buffet0%

Transonic buffet approaching the Mach limit. Meaningful for jets near MMO, zero for pistons and turboprops that never get there.

More: stronger transonic buffet near the Mach limit.

Less: a smoother high-Mach ride.

Why here: Sets high-Mach buffet strength; onset and full-strength thresholds are separate.

Flap buffet0%

Low-frequency airframe vibration with flaps extended into the airflow, in the speed window where they actually work the air.

More: a rougher ride with flaps working the air.

Less: smoother approach flap.

Why here: Sets flap buffet at the configured position and speed gates. Flap movement texture is separate.

Gear buffet0%

Airframe drumming from retractable gear hanging in the airstream. Zero for fixed-gear types, where the airframe never changes shape.

More: more drumming with the wheels hanging out.

Less: cleaner gear-down flight.

Why here: Sets gear aerodynamic buffet; movement and ground-contact cues are separate.

Stick shaker50%

The dedicated stall stick-shaker buzz, fired by the aircraft's own stall-warning system. Only types with a real shaker get a value; everything else relies on aerodynamic buffet and the horn.

More: a harder stick-shaker buzz.

Less: a subtler shaker.

Why here: Sets triggered shaker strength; inactive while the shaker feature is disabled.

Effect gains · engine, mechanical & drag

Touchdown thump75%

The one-shot kick when the wheels meet the runway, scaled by sink rate: a greaser whispers, a firm arrival thumps.

More: a harder kick at touchdown.

Less: softer arrivals.

Why here: Sets landing-impact strength; landing telemetry and response shape determine the pulse.

Reverse rumble0%

Rollout vibration while reverse thrust or beta-range props are working. Zero for types without reverse.

More: a rougher rollout under reverse.

Less: quieter reverse.

Why here: Sets reverse-thrust vibration with valid reverser and engine conditions. Zero removes the cue.

Engine rumble12%

Continuous powerplant vibration following RPM between idle and full power, the ever-present reminder that something is burning fuel up front.

More: more engine through the stick.

Less: a quieter powerplant.

Why here: Sets estimated engine vibration using configured telemetry and response, not measured cockpit vibration.

Flap motion12%

Continuous vibration only while the sim reports the flap surfaces actually travelling. It follows real actuator motion and failures, not an estimated timer.

More: more vibration while the flap surfaces travel.

Less: quieter flap runs.

Why here: Sets texture from observed flap movement; a command without movement does not establish the cue.

Autopilot follow

AP follow authority5%

How far autopilot commands may physically move the stick. Kept tiny in MSFS, where a moved axis can read back as pilot input; zero disables following entirely.

More: the autopilot visibly moves your stick further.

Less: a barely perceptible follow.

Why here: Sets admitted AP-follow gain, not a percentage of travel. Runtime ownership and input limits still apply.

Stick feel

StickFeel · Trim feel enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Retained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement.

StickFeel · Trim relief enabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Allows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount.

StickFeel · Force trim enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Enables local force trim, separate from aircraft-owned trim and add-on integration qualification.

StickFeel · G load enabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Allows load-factor changes to modify permitted spring laws. Passive fly-by-wire feel can suppress it.

StickFeel · Rate damping enabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Enables rate damping with the configured coefficients and control law.

Autopilot

Autopilot · Follow enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Autopilot following is off; the configured spring and load retain the hardware feel.

Autopilot · Neutral hold enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Permits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target.

Autopilot · Neutral hold strength0.6

Why here: Sets admitted AP neutral-hold strength; inactive while neutral hold is disabled.

Aero

Aero · EnabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Enables aerodynamic cues; each still needs nonzero strength and its simulator conditions.

Aero · Max flap index3

Where this effect reaches full strength (or has fully faded, for washouts).

More: a more gradual build to a later peak.

Less: a quicker build.

Why here: Sets the final flap index for detent normalization. UP plus three detents uses maximum index3.

Aero · Min flap index2

Where this effect begins fading in.

More: the effect begins later.

Less: it begins earlier.

Why here: Sets the first flap detent that admits buffet; this is a handle index, not degrees.

Aero · Shaker enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Permits shaker at supported warning conditions; the switch does not establish aircraft equipment.

Ground

Ground · EnabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Enables ground effects; each still needs its own strength and contact or motion telemetry.

Engine

Engine · EnabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Enables engine cues with nonzero settings and valid running-engine telemetry.

Mechanical

Mechanical · EnabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Why here: Enables accessory cues with configured strengths and observed accessory movement.

Mechanical · Gain0.12

The strength of this effect.

More: a stronger effect.

Less: a weaker one.

Why here: Sets texture from observed gear movement, separate from aerodynamic and touchdown effects.

All profile settings
Estimated profile settings
ParameterValueWhat it controls and why
Spring strength0.74 The selected mechanical-control loading belongs to the named B-17G reference; four engine cues do not establish a multiple of yoke hand force. The baseline spring is 0.74. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 70 KIAS.
Spring deadband0.04 Sets travel around the centre before the baseline spring resists. Smaller values engage it sooner.
Force gain0.46 The aerodynamic-load gain is 0.46 with an indicated-speed reference of 150 KIAS. This supplies speed-dependent loading alongside the spring.
Master gain0.85 Scales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits.
Dynamic-pressure blendTrue Allows baseline spring strength to rise with indicated airspeed where the control law permits it.
Minimum spring factor0.55 Sets low-speed spring strength as a fraction of baseline when blending is enabled. One keeps full strength.
Spring wake-up speed20 ktSets the IAS where the low-speed spring blend starts rising. This is a feel threshold, not a flight limit.
Spring full-strength speed70 ktSets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it.
Force tuning speed150 ktSets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit.
Airspeed spring stiffening0.1 The high-speed spring-stiffening gain is 0.1. It strengthens the permitted spring response above 70 KIAS, with the squared-speed ratio capped at 5.
Airspeed stiffening cap5 Limits the squared airspeed ratio used for high-speed spring stiffening; it is not a device-force cap.
Aileron force scale0.65 Roll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.65 and 0.86, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled.
Elevator force scale0.86 Scales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings.
Maximum output force0.55 Caps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate.
StickFeel · Trim feel enabledFalse Retained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement.
StickFeel · Trim relief enabledTrue Allows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount.
StickFeel · Elevator authority0.3 Three-axis trim tabs support separate pitch and roll pressure relief, with developer revision differences kept visible. Pitch authority 0.3 provides load relief and permitted centre movement; roll authority is 0.13.
StickFeel · Aileron authority0.13 Scales supported roll-trim relief and permitted centre movement. Zero removes roll response.
StickFeel · Force trim enabledFalse Enables local force trim, separate from aircraft-owned trim and add-on integration qualification.
StickFeel · G load enabledTrue Allows load-factor changes to modify permitted spring laws. Passive fly-by-wire feel can suppress it.
StickFeel · Rate damping enabledTrue Enables rate damping with the configured coefficients and control law.
Autopilot · Follow enabledFalse Autopilot following is off; the configured spring and load retain the hardware feel.
Autopilot · Follow authority0.05 Sets admitted AP-follow gain, not a percentage of travel. Runtime ownership and input limits still apply.
Autopilot · Neutral hold enabledFalse Permits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target.
Autopilot · Neutral hold strength0.6 Sets admitted AP neutral-hold strength; inactive while neutral hold is disabled.
Aero · EnabledTrue Enables aerodynamic cues; each still needs nonzero strength and its simulator conditions.
Aero · Gain0.35 Sets stall-buffet strength. Zero removes the cue without changing simulator stalls or warnings.
Aero · Gain0 Sets high-Mach buffet strength; onset and full-strength thresholds are separate.
Aero · Gain0 Sets flap buffet at the configured position and speed gates. Flap movement texture is separate.
Aero · Max flap index3 Sets the final flap index for detent normalization. UP plus three detents uses maximum index3.
Aero · Min flap index2 Sets the first flap detent that admits buffet; this is a handle index, not degrees.
Aero · Gain0 Sets gear aerodynamic buffet; movement and ground-contact cues are separate.
Aero · Shaker enabledFalse Permits shaker at supported warning conditions; the switch does not establish aircraft equipment.
Aero · Amplitude0.5 Sets triggered shaker strength; inactive while the shaker feature is disabled.
Ground · EnabledTrue Enables ground effects; each still needs its own strength and contact or motion telemetry.
Ground · Gain0.42 Sets rolling texture strength, modified by speed, surface and undercarriage configuration.
Ground · Gain0.3 Sets gear-bump texture during ground motion, separate from touchdown impact.
Ground · Gain0.75 Sets landing-impact strength; landing telemetry and response shape determine the pulse.
Ground · Gain0 Sets reverse-thrust vibration with valid reverser and engine conditions. Zero removes the cue.
Engine · EnabledTrue Enables engine cues with nonzero settings and valid running-engine telemetry.
Engine · Gain0.12 Sets estimated engine vibration using configured telemetry and response, not measured cockpit vibration.
Mechanical · EnabledTrue Enables accessory cues with configured strengths and observed accessory movement.
Mechanical · Gain0.12 Sets texture from observed flap movement; a command without movement does not establish the cue.
Mechanical · Gain0.12 Sets texture from observed gear movement, separate from aerodynamic and touchdown effects.
Public sources 10
  1. Boeing B-17 Flying FortressResearch background · retrieved 2026-09-12
  2. B-17G Flying FortressExact2024productProduct listing captured 2026-09-30; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  3. B-17G Flying FortressOfficial developer / designated store catalogue ·Official developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  4. Advertised B17G manualDeveloper manual PDF6,7,15-18; earlyaccessfrontmatter
  5. B17G changelogAuthorizedchangelog1.0.3and1.0.4,March/May2026
  6. Learning to Fly the FortressEileen Bjorkman · July 2015 · checkout purchased in 2013
  7. Stories of a B-17 PilotDick Nelms interview · 29 June 2019
  8. ‘Bloody Hundredth’ B-17 Pilot Shares WWII ExperiencesKaren Abeyasekere interviews John A. Clark · 6 May 2022
  9. Boeing B-17F Flying FortressFamily history and the museum’s 42-29782
  10. ICAO Doc 8643 — aircraft type designatorsPublic search data retrieved 2026-09-14; authority update 2026-09-03

Community & corrections

If your time in the type says this page got something wrong, correct it here.

Pilot corrections

Fly this aircraft? Correct this page.

This page is built from cited references, and real time in the type beats a citation. Quote the claim that reads wrong and tell us what the actual aircraft does. Corrections go to the maintainer for review and feed the next revision of this research.

Hangar talk

Open conversation about flying and tuning the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, in the community forum. Corrections above go privately to the maintainer; hangar talk is public.

No hangar talk for the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress yet. Be the first.

Community

Community profiles for this aircraft

No community profiles for this aircraft yet. Tuned it your way? Share a profile and it will appear here.