Bibliothèque d'appareilsCessna 172 Skyhawk
Cessna 172 SkyhawkAdrian Pingstone · Public domain · 1966 Reims F172G

Cessna 172 Skyhawk

Cable-operated yoke controls with airspeed-dependent resistance, pitch-trim relief and a stall-warning horn.
General aviationC17227 choix de profil

Connaître l'avion

The Skyhawk developed from the tailwheel Cessna 170, adopting tricycle landing gear. The first 172 flew in 1955. Its combination of a practical cabin, fixed undercarriage and straightforward layout helped make it a familiar aircraft for personal flying and instruction.

The 172's long history includes different engines, panels and equipment. That variety is especially visible in simulation: a conventional-instrument aircraft, a G1000-equipped version and an add-on with persistent maintenance systems offer different experiences despite sharing the same basic silhouette.

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (G1000)

Powerplant
Lycoming IO-360-L2A, 180 hp↗
Seats
4↗
Max takeoff weight
2,550 lb (1,157 kg)↗
Wingspan
36 ft 1 in (11.0 m)↗
Length
27 ft 2 in (8.28 m)↗
Never exceed (Vne)
163 KIAS↗
Max structural cruise (Vno)
129 KIAS↗
Maneuvering (Va)
105 KIAS at 2,550 lb↗
Stall, landing config (Vs0)
40 KCAS↗
Cruise
≈124 KTAS at 75% power↗
Service ceiling
14,000 ft↗
Usable fuel
53 US gal↗

En savoir plus sur cet aéronef sur AirframeDB

A familiar shape that evolved

The 172 began with the tailwheel Cessna 170. Moving the third wheel to the nose helped create the aircraft that became familiar to generations of students. Its outline changed along the way: early examples had a straight fin, the swept fin arrived with the 172A, and the lowered rear fuselage and rear window followed with the 172D. A photograph of an early Skyhawk can therefore look surprisingly different from the training aircraft on a modern ramp.

Familiar controls, a different engine experience

Flying factory JT-A N688CS from San Marcos, Texas, Goyer immediately noticed how different the turbodiesel sounded. Its quieter whirr accompanied a climb that felt convincingly stronger than the earlier diesel Skyhawk the writer had evaluated. The cockpit also changed the pilot's relationship with the engine: one power lever requested output while electronic controls managed fuel and propeller settings. The report describes the Continental-powered JT-A and its Garmin NXi installation, rather than the conventional Lycoming-powered training aircraft that shares its silhouette.

Despite those changes, Goyer found the flight-control feel and most of the familiar Skyhawk flying manners intact. One difference appeared in landing: the demonstrator seemed inclined to float more when approach speed was not closely controlled. The writer suggested residual thrust as a possible explanation, explicitly as an interpretation.

Living with an early straight-tail 172

Davisson's account of Jim Landers's restored 1957 aircraft explains why an early 172 can feel different before it even leaves the ground. The low instrument panel and more upright seating create an unusually open view over the nose. He describes the six-cylinder Continental as smoother than the later Lycomings and finds the aircraft's familiar, approachable character already present in this early version. Landers had moved up from a Cessna 150 chiefly to gain useful space for travelling with his wife and their baggage.

That extra space did not mean treating every seat as routinely available. Operating in Arizona, Landers generally used the aircraft as a two-person tourer and took high density altitude seriously when deciding on a load. His account also includes the less glamorous side of ownership: an engine failure inside the crankcase led to a rebuild, and the polished finish required considerable labour.

A student’s view of the glass-panel Skyhawk

For Cox's 2009 review, student pilot Peggy Herrera offered a perspective quite different from a veteran test pilot's. She had been able to try a varied group of aircraft and was training in a recent, air-conditioned Skyhawk with Garmin G1000 instruments. What she appreciated most was the aircraft's unhurried response: gentle control behaviour, effective flaps and low speeds in the circuit left her time to understand what was happening. That mattered particularly while she was learning to land.

Her principal difficulty lay in the panel rather than the airframe. The G1000 initially felt overwhelming until its organisation began to make sense, and the tall instrument panel could restrict the view for a shorter pilot despite the adjustable seat. Cox set those observations alongside his own experience in numerous Skyhawks, including long trips, and described the model's appeal as a balance of useful qualities.

Sources publiques 34
  1. Cessna 172Research background · Wikipedia revision 1374422697 · retrieved 2026-09-12
  2. Microsoft Flight Simulator aircraft manuals
  3. MSFS 2024 FAQ and edition aircraft inventory
  4. MSFS 2020 FAQ and edition aircraft inventory
  5. Cessna 172 SP POH
  6. X-Plane 12 Desktop Manual
  7. X-Plane aircraft and avionics manuals
  8. X-Plane 11 Desktop Manual
  9. C172 DigitalOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  10. Cessna 172: Everyman’s AirplaneAOPA Pilot, May 1992: a retrospective on the real Skyhawk.
  11. Cessna 172M DGS series XP12Official developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  12. C172 NG AnalogOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  13. Reality Expansion Pack · Default XP11/12 Cessna 172SPOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  14. Turbodiesel Cessna 172 JT-AIsabel Goyer · 12 March 2018. Continental CD-155-powered factory JT-A, N688CS. Byline as currently published.
  15. Cessna C172 (1957) pilot report: Straight Tail TaleBudd Davisson, with owner Jim Landers · Undated hosted article about Jim Landers’s 1957 Cessna 172. Historical owner and writer observations; not current operating advice.
  16. 2009 Cessna 172S: Skyhawk in Year 53Peggy Herrera, interviewed by Bill Cox · 24 March 2009. Herrera’s training in a 2008 G1000-equipped Skyhawk, interviewed within Cox’s 172S review.
  17. C172 NG DIGITAL-airfoillabs-C172NGOfficial developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
  18. C172 NG ANALOG XP12-airfoillabs-C172NGAOfficial developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
  19. Cessna 172SP Skyhawk XP11-airfoillabs-C172SPOfficial developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
  20. ICAO Doc 8643 — aircraft type designatorsPublic search data retrieved 2026-09-14; authority update 2026-09-03
  21. FAA JO 7360.1K — aircraft type designatorsActive FAA order; checked 2026-09-14
  22. C172 Amphibian current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  23. C172 Bushkit current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  24. C172 Taildragger current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  25. C172M current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  26. C172SP AS1000 improvement current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  27. FR172 Reims Rocket / R172 Hawk XP II current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  28. C172 MSFS2020 – CarenadoProduct listing captured 2026-09-23; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  29. C172 MSFS2024 – CarenadoProduct listing captured 2026-09-23; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  30. WBSim C172SP current changes and interface documentation scopeProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  31. C-172S, C-172R, C-172M/N Enhanced Flight ModelsProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  32. Cessna 172S POH; FAA TCDS 3A12Référence imprimée ou archivée ; aucun lien public
  33. Cessna 172S POHRéférence imprimée ou archivée ; aucun lien public
  34. FAA TCDS 3A12Référence imprimée ou archivée ; aucun lien public

Comment le profil le modélise

Bagolu R172 Hawk XP II 195hp

Free + Pro
MSFS 2020MSFS 2024Bagolu

The Skyhawk developed from the tailwheel Cessna 170, adopting tricycle landing gear. The first 172 flew in 1955. Its combination of a practical cabin, fixed undercarriage and straightforward layout helped make it a familiar aircraft for personal flying and instruction.

This profile selects Bagolu R172 Hawk XP II 195hp for MSFS 2020, MSFS 2024.

Spring resistance builds with the selected airspeed response. A separate aerodynamic term adds speed-dependent control load.

Valid trim provides the configured pressure relief. Autopilot following is off.

Cette révision précise n’est pas encore autorisée à l’installation publique.

Controls and trim

C172 manuals describe mechanical cables and linkages operating the primary controls and an elevator trim tab operated from the cockpit wheel. Published handling accounts describe greater elevator effort than aileron effort and hands-off stability after trimming. These are qualitative accounts, not one fixed ratio for every Skyhawk or loading condition. Engine upgrades, float kits, taildragger conversions and analog or glass panels retain their own simulator scope.

Cessna-authored 172S POH preserved by aircraft operator; verify avionics and revisionCessna 172M manufacturer POHCessna 172 SkyhawkCessna 172 Skyhawk

The selected implementation

Bagolu separates the 195-hp Hawk XP II, 210-hp Reims Rocket and amphibian. Their constant-speed propeller and rudder trim do not establish an aileron-trim command.

Cessna-authored 172S POH preserved by aircraft operator; verify avionics and revisionFR172 Reims Rocket / R172 Hawk XP II

About the values

The gains are normalized profile settings. They describe the chosen effect balance; hand force depends on the device and its output limits. IAS references are tuning values rather than operating limits. Physical acceptance of this revision remains pending.

Master gain & control system

Master gain85%

L'échelle globale finale appliquée à tout ce que produit le modèle, avant la limite du périphérique.

Plus : tout (ressort, charges, effets) se renforce ensemble.

Moins : tout s'adoucit ensemble.

Pourquoi ici : Scales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits.

Forces

Spring strength74%

La force de rappel de base qui ramène le manche au neutre. Toutes les autres forces s'empilent dessus. Trop faible, le manche paraît mou en vol normal ; trop forte, elle lutte contre la main et masque les signaux plus fins.

Plus : un centrage plus ferme qui résiste davantage à la main.

Moins : un manche plus mou qui ne compte que sur la charge aérodynamique.

Pourquoi ici : Mechanical controls and published pitch-heavy handling motivate speed-dependent yoke resistance and a separately selected roll balance. The baseline spring is 0.74. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 50 KIAS.

Cessna-authored 172S POH preserved by aircraft operator; verify avionics and revisionCessna 172M manufacturer POHCessna 172 SkyhawkCessna 172 Skyhawk
Spring deadband4%

Une petite zone neutre autour du centre où le ressort reste muet, pour que les micro-mouvements à l'arrêt ne vibrent pas. Plus large, c'est plus calme mais plus lâche ; plus étroite, plus précis mais parfois nerveux au neutre.

Plus : un centre plus calme mais plus lâche, avec plus de jeu.

Moins : un centre plus serré qui peut vibrer au repos.

Pourquoi ici : Sets travel around the centre before the baseline spring resists. Smaller values engage it sooner.

Overall aerodynamic load80%

Une échelle maîtresse sur les deux charges d'axe, appliquée avant leur équilibre individuel. Les profils la laissent en général en place et règlent les deux axes.

Plus : les deux axes chargent plus fort.

Moins : les deux axes s'allègent ensemble.

Pourquoi ici : The aerodynamic-load gain is 0.8 with an indicated-speed reference of 115 KIAS. This supplies speed-dependent loading alongside the spring.

Airspeed blendingTrue

Active la fenêtre d'engagement basse vitesse du ressort (début/plein en nœuds ci-dessus). Désactivé, le ressort est constant à toute vitesse.

Pourquoi ici : Allows baseline spring strength to rise with indicated airspeed where the control law permits it.

Low-speed spring floor55%

La part du ressort qui survit à l'arrêt, avant que la vitesse ne crée la moindre force aérodynamique. Un plancher haut garde le manche ferme au parking ; un plancher bas donne le jeu de câbles d'un avion léger au parking.

Plus : un manche plus ferme au parking et au roulage.

Moins : un manche mou au parking qui ne s'éveille qu'avec la vitesse.

Pourquoi ici : Sets low-speed spring strength as a fraction of baseline when blending is enabled. One keeps full strength.

Spring engagement start8 kt

La vitesse à laquelle le ressort quitte son plancher basse vitesse vers la pleine raideur : le début du réveil des commandes au roulage de décollage.

Pourquoi ici : Sets the IAS where the low-speed spring blend starts rising. This is a feel threshold, not a flight limit.

Spring engagement full50 kt

La vitesse où le ressort atteint sa pleine raideur. Entre le début et ce point, le centrage se raffermit avec le vent relatif.

Pourquoi ici : Sets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it.

Vitesse de réglage des forces115

La vitesse indiquée où la charge aérodynamique atteint son niveau de conception. Elle ancre toute la courbe au domaine réel : un 172 charge dès 110 nœuds, un jet bien plus tard.

Plus : les charges arrivent plus tard ; le manche reste léger jusqu'à plus vite.

Moins : les charges arrivent plus tôt et la croisière pèse davantage.

Pourquoi ici : Sets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit.

Centre firmness vs speed15%

Combien le centrage lui-même se raidit avec la vitesse, en plus des charges de braquage. Zéro garde un centre constant ; plus fait centrer dur en croisière et souple en tour de piste.

Plus : un centre qui durcit nettement avec la vitesse.

Moins : une sensation de centre constante à toute vitesse.

Pourquoi ici : The high-speed spring-stiffening gain is 0.15. It strengthens the permitted spring response above 50 KIAS, with the squared-speed ratio capped at 5.

Centre stiffening cap5

La limite haute du raidissement lié à la vitesse, pour que le vol très rapide ne remonte pas le ressort sans borne.

Plus : plus de raidissement total permis à haute vitesse.

Moins : le raidissement se bride plus tôt.

Pourquoi ici : Limits the squared airspeed ratio used for high-speed spring stiffening; it is not a device-force cap.

Aileron load72%

La charge de roulis soutenue issue du braquage d'ailerons et de la vitesse, équilibrée indépendamment du tangage. Avec la charge de profondeur, elle fixe l'harmonie des commandes dont parlent les essais.

Plus : des efforts de roulis plus lourds.

Moins : des ailerons plus légers, plus vifs.

Pourquoi ici : Roll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.72 and 1, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled.

Elevator load100%

La charge de tangage soutenue issue du braquage de profondeur et de la vitesse, équilibrée indépendamment du roulis. Le levier principal du poids en tangage d'un type. Il ne touche ni ailerons, ni ressort, ni trim, ni buffet.

Plus : des efforts de tangage soutenus plus lourds en vitesse.

Moins : une profondeur plus légère, moins musclée à tenir.

Pourquoi ici : Scales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings.

Max output force55%

Un plafond par force stable de tangage ou roulis avant le périphérique : la garde contre le claquement ou la saturation du matériel en manœuvre forte.

Plus : des pics de force stable plus élevés avant écrêtage.

Moins : un plafond plus doux ; les manœuvres dures s'aplatissent plus tôt.

Pourquoi ici : Caps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate.

Trim

Trim relief (elevator)30%

Combien le trim de profondeur soulage l'effort tenu et déplace le point de repos du manche. À 100 %, un avion bien compensé ne demande aucune pression : le geste réel de compenser la charge.

Plus : le trim retire plus d'effort tenu ; à 100 %, plein trim l'annule.

Moins : vous continuez à tenir de l'effort même compensé.

Pourquoi ici : The elevator trim tab supports pitch-load relief. A ground-adjustable rudder tab is not a pilot-operated aileron-trim signal. Pitch authority 0.3 provides load relief and permitted centre movement; roll authority is 0.

Cessna-authored 172S POH preserved by aircraft operator; verify avionics and revisionCessna 172M manufacturer POHCessna 172 SkyhawkCessna 172 Skyhawk
Trim relief (aileron)0%

Le même soulagement pour le trim de roulis. La plupart des avions légers n'ont pas de vrai trim d'ailerons, donc zéro ; les types qui en ont reçoivent une valeur adaptée.

Plus : le trim de roulis retire plus d'effort tenu.

Moins : le trim de roulis fait moins.

Pourquoi ici : Scales supported roll-trim relief and permitted centre movement. Zero removes roll response.

Effect gains · Ground

Runway rumble40%

Vibration de roulement issue de la vitesse des roues et du revêtement : la texture du bitume, de l'herbe ou du gravier sous le train.

Plus : une texture de surface plus forte dans le manche.

Moins : un roulage plus lisse.

Pourquoi ici : Sets rolling texture strength, modified by speed, surface and undercarriage configuration.

Gear bumps25%

Chocs courts et distincts des joints, ornières et surfaces rugueuses : la ponctuation au-dessus du grondement continu.

Plus : des chocs plus nets des joints et ornières.

Moins : des détails de sol plus doux.

Pourquoi ici : Sets gear-bump texture during ground motion, separate from touchdown impact.

Effect gains · Airframe

Stall buffet35%

Buffet de cellule à l'approche du décrochage et pendant l'avertisseur : la voix de cette aile quand elle est mécontente. Les types à décrochage franc reçoivent un buffet modéré, le klaxon porte l'alerte.

Plus : un tremblement pré-décrochage plus fort.

Moins : une aile plus discrète ; le klaxon porte l'alerte.

Pourquoi ici : Sets stall-buffet strength. Zero removes the cue without changing simulator stalls or warnings.

Mach buffet0%

Buffet transsonique près de la limite de Mach. Parlant pour les jets près de MMO, zéro pour pistons et turbopropulseurs qui n'y vont jamais.

Plus : un buffet transsonique plus fort près de la limite de Mach.

Moins : un vol plus lisse à haut Mach.

Pourquoi ici : Sets high-Mach buffet strength; onset and full-strength thresholds are separate.

Flap buffet0%

Vibration basse fréquence de cellule avec les volets dans le vent, dans la fenêtre où ils travaillent vraiment l'air.

Plus : un vol plus rugueux volets au travail.

Moins : des volets d'approche plus doux.

Pourquoi ici : Sets flap buffet at the configured position and speed gates. Flap movement texture is separate.

Gear buffet0%

Le tambourinement du train rentrant sorti dans le flux. Zéro pour les trains fixes, dont la cellule ne change jamais de forme.

Plus : plus de tambourinement train sorti.

Moins : un vol train sorti plus propre.

Pourquoi ici : Sets gear aerodynamic buffet; movement and ground-contact cues are separate.

Stick shaker50%

Le vibreur de manche dédié, déclenché par l'avertisseur de décrochage de l'avion. Seuls les types à vrai vibreur reçoivent une valeur ; les autres comptent sur buffet et klaxon.

Plus : un vibreur plus dur.

Moins : un vibreur plus discret.

Pourquoi ici : Sets triggered shaker strength; inactive while the shaker feature is disabled.

Effect gains · Engine, mechanical & drag

Touchdown thump65%

Le coup unique au toucher, proportionnel au taux de chute : un kiss se murmure, une arrivée ferme cogne.

Plus : un coup plus dur au toucher.

Moins : des arrivées plus douces.

Pourquoi ici : Sets landing-impact strength; landing telemetry and response shape determine the pulse.

Reverse rumble0%

Vibration de roulage sous inversion de poussée ou plage bêta. Zéro pour les types sans reverse.

Plus : un roulage plus rugueux sous reverse.

Moins : une reverse plus discrète.

Pourquoi ici : Sets reverse-thrust vibration with valid reverser and engine conditions. Zero removes the cue.

Engine rumble12%

Vibration continue du moteur suivant le régime du ralenti à la pleine puissance : le rappel permanent que quelque chose brûle du carburant devant.

Plus : plus de moteur dans le manche.

Moins : un moteur plus discret.

Pourquoi ici : Sets estimated engine vibration using configured telemetry and response, not measured cockpit vibration.

Flap motion12%

Vibration continue seulement pendant que le simulateur signale les volets réellement en mouvement. Elle suit la course réelle et les pannes, pas un minuteur estimé.

Plus : plus de vibration volets en mouvement.

Moins : des courses de volets plus discrètes.

Pourquoi ici : Sets texture from observed flap movement; a command without movement does not establish the cue.

Autopilot follow

AP follow authority10%

Jusqu'où les ordres du pilote automatique peuvent bouger le manche physique. Minuscule dans MSFS, où un axe déplacé peut être relu comme entrée pilote ; zéro coupe le suivi.

Plus : le pilote automatique bouge visiblement plus votre manche.

Moins : un suivi à peine perceptible.

Pourquoi ici : Sets admitted AP-follow gain, not a percentage of travel. Runtime ownership and input limits still apply.

Stick feel

StickFeel · Trim feel enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Retained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement.

StickFeel · Trim relief enabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Allows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount.

StickFeel · Force trim enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Enables local force trim, separate from aircraft-owned trim and add-on integration qualification.

StickFeel · G load enabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Allows load-factor changes to modify permitted spring laws. Passive fly-by-wire feel can suppress it.

StickFeel · Rate damping enabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Enables rate damping with the configured coefficients and control law.

Autopilot

Autopilot · Follow enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Autopilot following is off; the configured spring and load retain the hardware feel.

Autopilot · Neutral hold enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Permits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target.

Autopilot · Neutral hold strength0.6

Pourquoi ici : Sets admitted AP neutral-hold strength; inactive while neutral hold is disabled.

Aero

Aero · EnabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Enables aerodynamic cues; each still needs nonzero strength and its simulator conditions.

Aero · Max flap index3

Where this effect reaches full strength (or has fully faded, for washouts).

Plus : a more gradual build to a later peak.

Moins : a quicker build.

Pourquoi ici : Sets the final flap index for detent normalization. UP plus three detents uses maximum index3.

Aero · Min flap index2

Where this effect begins fading in.

Plus : the effect begins later.

Moins : it begins earlier.

Pourquoi ici : Sets the first flap detent that admits buffet; this is a handle index, not degrees.

Aero · Shaker enabledFalse

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Permits shaker at supported warning conditions; the switch does not establish aircraft equipment.

Ground

Ground · EnabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Enables ground effects; each still needs its own strength and contact or motion telemetry.

Engine

Engine · EnabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Enables engine cues with nonzero settings and valid running-engine telemetry.

Mechanical

Mechanical · EnabledTrue

Whether this feature is active in this profile.

Pourquoi ici : Enables accessory cues with configured strengths and observed accessory movement.

Mechanical · Gain0

The strength of this effect.

Plus : a stronger effect.

Moins : a weaker one.

Pourquoi ici : Sets texture from observed gear movement, separate from aerodynamic and touchdown effects.

Tous les réglages du profil
Réglages estimés du profil
ParamètreValeurCe que cela contrôle et pourquoi
Spring strength0.74 Mechanical controls and published pitch-heavy handling motivate speed-dependent yoke resistance and a separately selected roll balance. The baseline spring is 0.74. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 50 KIAS.
Spring deadband0.04 Sets travel around the centre before the baseline spring resists. Smaller values engage it sooner.
Force gain0.8 The aerodynamic-load gain is 0.8 with an indicated-speed reference of 115 KIAS. This supplies speed-dependent loading alongside the spring.
Master gain0.85 Scales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits.
Dynamic-pressure blendTrue Allows baseline spring strength to rise with indicated airspeed where the control law permits it.
Minimum spring factor0.55 Sets low-speed spring strength as a fraction of baseline when blending is enabled. One keeps full strength.
Spring wake-up speed8 ktSets the IAS where the low-speed spring blend starts rising. This is a feel threshold, not a flight limit.
Spring full-strength speed50 ktSets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it.
Vitesse de réglage des forces115 ktSets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit.
Airspeed spring stiffening0.15 The high-speed spring-stiffening gain is 0.15. It strengthens the permitted spring response above 50 KIAS, with the squared-speed ratio capped at 5.
Airspeed stiffening cap5 Limits the squared airspeed ratio used for high-speed spring stiffening; it is not a device-force cap.
Aileron force scale0.72 Roll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.72 and 1, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled.
Elevator force scale1.0 Scales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings.
Maximum output force0.55 Caps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate.
StickFeel · Trim feel enabledFalse Retained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement.
StickFeel · Trim relief enabledTrue Allows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount.
StickFeel · Elevator authority0.3 The elevator trim tab supports pitch-load relief. A ground-adjustable rudder tab is not a pilot-operated aileron-trim signal. Pitch authority 0.3 provides load relief and permitted centre movement; roll authority is 0.
StickFeel · Aileron authority0 Scales supported roll-trim relief and permitted centre movement. Zero removes roll response.
StickFeel · Force trim enabledFalse Enables local force trim, separate from aircraft-owned trim and add-on integration qualification.
StickFeel · G load enabledTrue Allows load-factor changes to modify permitted spring laws. Passive fly-by-wire feel can suppress it.
StickFeel · Rate damping enabledTrue Enables rate damping with the configured coefficients and control law.
Autopilot · Follow enabledFalse Autopilot following is off; the configured spring and load retain the hardware feel.
Autopilot · Follow authority0.1 Sets admitted AP-follow gain, not a percentage of travel. Runtime ownership and input limits still apply.
Autopilot · Neutral hold enabledFalse Permits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target.
Autopilot · Neutral hold strength0.6 Sets admitted AP neutral-hold strength; inactive while neutral hold is disabled.
Aero · EnabledTrue Enables aerodynamic cues; each still needs nonzero strength and its simulator conditions.
Aero · Gain0.35 Sets stall-buffet strength. Zero removes the cue without changing simulator stalls or warnings.
Aero · Gain0 Sets high-Mach buffet strength; onset and full-strength thresholds are separate.
Aero · Gain0 Sets flap buffet at the configured position and speed gates. Flap movement texture is separate.
Aero · Max flap index3 Sets the final flap index for detent normalization. UP plus three detents uses maximum index3.
Aero · Min flap index2 Sets the first flap detent that admits buffet; this is a handle index, not degrees.
Aero · Gain0 Sets gear aerodynamic buffet; movement and ground-contact cues are separate.
Aero · Shaker enabledFalse Permits shaker at supported warning conditions; the switch does not establish aircraft equipment.
Aero · Amplitude0.5 Sets triggered shaker strength; inactive while the shaker feature is disabled.
Ground · EnabledTrue Enables ground effects; each still needs its own strength and contact or motion telemetry.
Ground · Gain0.4 Sets rolling texture strength, modified by speed, surface and undercarriage configuration.
Ground · Gain0.25 Sets gear-bump texture during ground motion, separate from touchdown impact.
Ground · Gain0.65 Sets landing-impact strength; landing telemetry and response shape determine the pulse.
Ground · Gain0 Sets reverse-thrust vibration with valid reverser and engine conditions. Zero removes the cue.
Engine · EnabledTrue Enables engine cues with nonzero settings and valid running-engine telemetry.
Engine · Gain0.12 Sets estimated engine vibration using configured telemetry and response, not measured cockpit vibration.
Mechanical · EnabledTrue Enables accessory cues with configured strengths and observed accessory movement.
Mechanical · Gain0.12 Sets texture from observed flap movement; a command without movement does not establish the cue.
Mechanical · Gain0 Sets texture from observed gear movement, separate from aerodynamic and touchdown effects.
Sources publiques 38
  1. Cessna 172Research background · Wikipedia revision 1374422697 · retrieved 2026-09-12
  2. Cessna-authored 172S POH preserved by aircraft operator; verify avionics and revisionCessna172S POH PDF p168(section7-6),p175(7-13),p40(2-4), table ; Cessna 172S POH PDF168 / printed7-6
  3. Cessna 172M manufacturer POHCessna172M POH PDF98/100/104, printed7-3/7-5/7-9,
  4. Cessna 172 SkyhawkCessna 172 Skyhawk
  5. Cessna 172 SkyhawkCessna 172 Skyhawk
  6. FR172 Reims Rocket / R172 Hawk XP IICurrent6.3.3 product: three variants, engines and controlsProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  7. Microsoft Flight Simulator aircraft manuals
  8. MSFS 2024 FAQ and edition aircraft inventory
  9. MSFS 2020 FAQ and edition aircraft inventory
  10. Cessna 172 SP POH
  11. X-Plane 12 Desktop Manual
  12. X-Plane aircraft and avionics manuals
  13. X-Plane 11 Desktop Manual
  14. C172 DigitalOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  15. Cessna 172: Everyman’s AirplaneAOPA Pilot, May 1992: a retrospective on the real Skyhawk.
  16. Cessna 172M DGS series XP12Official developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  17. C172 NG AnalogOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  18. Reality Expansion Pack · Default XP11/12 Cessna 172SPOfficial developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12
  19. Turbodiesel Cessna 172 JT-AIsabel Goyer · 12 March 2018. Continental CD-155-powered factory JT-A, N688CS. Byline as currently published.
  20. Cessna C172 (1957) pilot report: Straight Tail TaleBudd Davisson, with owner Jim Landers · Undated hosted article about Jim Landers’s 1957 Cessna 172. Historical owner and writer observations; not current operating advice.
  21. 2009 Cessna 172S: Skyhawk in Year 53Peggy Herrera, interviewed by Bill Cox · 24 March 2009. Herrera’s training in a 2008 G1000-equipped Skyhawk, interviewed within Cox’s 172S review.
  22. C172 NG DIGITAL-airfoillabs-C172NGOfficial developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
  23. C172 NG ANALOG XP12-airfoillabs-C172NGAOfficial developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
  24. Cessna 172SP Skyhawk XP11-airfoillabs-C172SPOfficial developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
  25. ICAO Doc 8643 — aircraft type designatorsPublic search data retrieved 2026-09-14; authority update 2026-09-03
  26. FAA JO 7360.1K — aircraft type designatorsActive FAA order; checked 2026-09-14
  27. C172 Amphibian current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  28. C172 Bushkit current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  29. C172 Taildragger current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  30. C172M current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  31. C172SP AS1000 improvement current productProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  32. C172 MSFS2020 – CarenadoProduct listing captured 2026-09-23; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  33. C172 MSFS2024 – CarenadoProduct listing captured 2026-09-23; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  34. WBSim C172SP current changes and interface documentation scopeProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  35. C-172S, C-172R, C-172M/N Enhanced Flight ModelsProduct listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
  36. Cessna 172S POH; FAA TCDS 3A12Référence imprimée ou archivée ; aucun lien public
  37. Cessna 172S POHRéférence imprimée ou archivée ; aucun lien public
  38. FAA TCDS 3A12Référence imprimée ou archivée ; aucun lien public

Communauté et corrections

Si votre expérience du type dit que cette page se trompe, corrigez-la ici.

Corrections de pilotes

Vous volez sur cet appareil ? Corrigez cette page.

Cette page repose sur des références citées, et l'expérience réelle du type vaut mieux qu'une citation. Citez l'affirmation erronée et dites-nous ce que fait l'appareil réel. Les corrections vont au mainteneur pour examen et nourrissent la prochaine révision de cette recherche.

Discussions de hangar

Conversation ouverte sur le pilotage et le réglage du Cessna 172 Skyhawk, sur le forum communautaire. Les corrections ci-dessus vont en privé au mainteneur ; les discussions de hangar sont publiques.

Pas encore de discussion de hangar sur le Cessna 172 Skyhawk. Lancez-la.

Communauté

Profils communautaires pour cet appareil

Pas encore de profils communautaires pour cet appareil. Réglé à votre façon ? Partagez un profil et il apparaîtra ici.